Firmware v1.52 (Beta) | LZW31-SN | Dimmer - Red Series (Gen 2)

[joshfee]

@Eric_Inovelli

Question for ya around the remote level protection – is this just a security feature (ie: if you by accident set the level on the switch in your UI) or is there another reason I’m not seeing? Just curious.

Pretty much to prevent accidental level changes. Like @mamber pointed out it would be nice to be able to intentionally set the level remotely to update the led bar but without having it affect the load at all.

@Eric_Inovelli

Yes, correct. This is how it’s setup now if you disable local or remote control, nothing will cut power to the switch be it at the switch itself (local) or via your hub/gateway (remote). With SBM enabled, the switch delivers 100% power to the bulb and then disables local control of the switch.

I reallllly encourage you to stop thinking disabling local/remote control is a solution here, as it is not. I DO want to be able to update the logical state of the switch (turn it on, off, set its dim level) both locally and remotely - I just don’t want it to change the load.

It is really useful to have a smart device on the wall that I can use to communicate with the hub. Scenes are not a replacement, as scenes don’t allow you to press and hold to gradually dim the value from 0 - 100%. Also even for on/off, to use scenes to accomplish this in home assistant I would have to create a virtual switch and have automations that turn it on and off when it sees

the scene events… this is so unnecessarily complicated when I already have a switch device that does all of the things I want… I just don’t want it to affect the power sent to my smart bulb.

@Eric_Inovelli

We kept Remote control enabled bc of safety reasons (ie: you’re away from your house, but your smart smoke alarm alerts you to a problem – you can cut power to that bulb).

Seems like a farfetched use case IMO - people will still have smart bulbs plugged into always-on outlets and not be able to kill power to them remotely. Maybe someone wants this as a feature, but it is definitely not required from a safety perspective.

@Eric_Inovelli

I’m confused here – can you clarify? The bulb should always be receiving 100% power from the switch.

I haven’t upgraded to 1.52 beta yet to test this, so maybe it is close to working, but it still sounds like power will be cut if I flip the switch off remotely (i.e. from automation), which prevents automations talking to the bulb until I remotely flip the switch back on

@Eric_Inovelli

I believe you can accomplish this via scene control if Associations are not an option (ie: tap up 1x = smart bulb turns on via switch sending a signal to your hub, tap down 1x = smart bulb turns off via switch sending a signal to your hub).

See above for why scenes are not a solution - they fire every time you press the button (i.e. I only want an event when there’s a state change), and also there is no dimming. I want to press and hold the dimmer to change the switch level, have that level reported to the hub, and automate based on that level. Scenes are great for 1-time events, but not for controlling state (that’s what the switch is supposed to do for me).

@Eric_Inovelli

That said, you can imagine my brain with the word orthogonal lol.

Haha! Basically just trying to say that disabling local/remote control is useful, but that it is not related in any way to the problems here.

@Eric_Inovelli

So, while we may be able to solve this via firmware, the hardware in a dimmer is much different and the reason why we can’t endorse putting it on outlets or other non-dimmable devices.

Fair enough, and I don’t think its a problem. Key point is remotely setting the level to 50% should update the LED to 50% but keep the power output at 100%.

@Eric_Inovelli

My brain is fried right now – I’ll have to come back to read this tbh. I love the energy and passion though. Thank you for breaking this down.

Haha completely understand. Yeah I just got my 10 switches in and started installing and was pretty disappointed when I found out that the “disable relay” option doesn’t completely disable the relay. But seeing you guys engage with the community to improve the firmware has me optimistic.

[Eric_Inovelli]

@joshfee

@Eric_Inovelli

Question for ya around the remote level protection – is this just a security feature (ie: if you by accident set the level on the switch in your UI) or is there another reason I’m not seeing? Just curious.

Pretty much to prevent accidental level changes. Like @mamber pointed out it would be nice to be able to intentionally set the level remotely to update the led bar but without having it affect the load at all.

Ok, but I guess what is the point of the LED bar moving and not reflecting the status of the load? I’m not pushing back, I promise – I’m just trying to really understand the use-case here. I see count-down timer suggested, but outside of that, I’m not sure what the use-case would be. Again, just curious more than anything as we also have to explain this to the firmware engineers where English is not their first language.

@joshfee

@Eric_Inovelli

Yes, correct. This is how it’s setup now if you disable local or remote control, nothing will cut power to the switch be it at the switch itself (local) or via your hub/gateway (remote). With SBM enabled, the switch delivers 100% power to the bulb and then disables local control of the switch.

I reallllly encourage you to stop thinking disabling local/remote control is a solution here, as it is not. I DO want to be able to update the logical state of the switch (turn it on, off, set its dim level) both locally and remotely - I just don’t want it to change the load.

I’m really trying to understand, I promise. I’m not sure why it’s not computing in my head or the rest of the team’s.

I think I understand what you’re saying and I think what it boils down to is you want the LED bar to sync with the smart load, right?

@joshfee

I DO want to be able to update the logical state of the switch (turn it on, off, set its dim level) both locally and remotely - I just don’t want it to change the load.

Can I ask what the point of this is? Why do you want to change the switch but not have it reflect the at the load?

The way it’s setup now is that the power going to the load is constant (as smart bulbs need 100% power) and if you want to change the intensity of the smart bulb you do so via either your app/voice assistant (by telling the bulb to raise/lower intensity) or you do it via the switch (association or scene control – and yes, I’ll get to your next paragraph below to address that concern).

So, I can’t figure out why you’d need control of the switch to turn on/off or dim your bulb. Again, I’m likely missing something and I apologize.

@joshfee

It is really useful to have a smart device on the wall that I can use to communicate with the hub. Scenes are not a replacement, as scenes don’t allow you to press and hold to gradually dim the value from 0 - 100%. Also even for on/off, to use scenes to accomplish this in home assistant I would have to create a virtual switch and have automations that turn it on and off when it sees the scene events… this is so unnecessarily complicated when I already have a switch device that does all of the things I want… I just don’t want it to affect the power sent to my smart bulb.

Scenes do allow you to do this, but I think I may be tracking in my theory that really what everything boils down to is a way to have the LED bar indicate where the smart bulb needs to be at virtually.

I can’t remember off the top of my head how to do this and maybe @EricM_Inovelli can explain better, but essentially with scenes you have a hold down scene and a release scene. When you hold down a scene command is sent and with some hubs (I know Hubitat can do this as I have this setup with Hue bulbs) it starts the dim up (or down) process and then when you release the paddle another scene command is sent to the hub and it tells the bulb to stop digitally dimming.

The disconnect is the LED bar will not notify you where you’re at so there’s a bit of guess work.

However, as I was messing around with it a bit more, I think I have had a breakthrough in how we could solve this potentially – again, I’m not a firmware engineer, so I’m not sure if it’s possible.

Under normal circumstances, when SBM (or local and/or remote control) are not active, when you dim up and down on the switch and release, the switch sends a, “SwitchMultiLevelReport” to the hub (ie: 60 = 60%). However, when SBM/local/remote are enabled, the switch no longer sends that report (it only reports the scene commands).

So, if we could somehow make the switch send the SwitchMultiLevelReport while SBM is enabled, you could set an automation to send that level to the smart bulb and if we can isolate the LED bar, it could tell the bar as well to go to 60. Does that make sense and is that what you’re getting at?

@joshfee

@Eric_Inovelli

We kept Remote control enabled bc of safety reasons (ie: you’re away from your house, but your smart smoke alarm alerts you to a problem – you can cut power to that bulb).

Seems like a farfetched use case IMO - people will still have smart bulbs plugged into always-on outlets and not be able to kill power to them remotely. Maybe someone wants this as a feature, but it is definitely not required from a safety perspective.

Noted – you can still enable remote protection separately, so we’ll likely keep this as is. I’m not familiar with HA though, so is it a PITA to do this?

@joshfee

@Eric_Inovelli

I’m confused here – can you clarify? The bulb should always be receiving 100% power from the switch.

I haven’t upgraded to 1.52 beta yet to test this, so maybe it is close to working, but it still sounds like power will be cut if I flip the switch off remotely (i.e. from automation), which prevents automations talking to the bulb until I remotely flip the switch back on

Yes it will be cut remotely unless remote control is on. For your automations, we would encourage you to use your bulbs instead of the switch if you want to automate your bulbs. But again, I’m likely missing something as to why you’d want to use the switch.

@joshfee

See above for why scenes are not a solution - they fire every time you press the button (i.e. I only want an event when there’s a state change), and also there is no dimming. I want to press and hold the dimmer to change the switch level, have that level reported to the hub, and automate based on that level. Scenes are great for 1-time events, but not for controlling state (that’s what the switch is supposed to do for me).

Well I guess I should’ve read further down before having my breakthrough – I think we’re saying the same thing now, right (ie: SwitchMultiLevelReport value)?

---

Fingers crossed I’m finally understanding. I also may move our convo over to the Smart Bulb Mode convo just an FYI.

[joshfee]

@Eric_Inovelli

So, if we could somehow make the switch send the SwitchMultiLevelReport while SBM is enabled, you could set an automation to send that level to the smart bulb and if we can isolate the LED bar, it could tell the bar as well to go to 60. Does that make sense and is that what you’re getting at?

This is more or less what I mean by the “logical state”. The switch would still keep track of the logical state (i.e. the LED, starting value next time you press/hold the paddle), but would not necessarily use that state to change the load (depending on what smartbulb mode you have).

Let me maybe try to explain the general desire differently. Forget about controlling a load at the wall entirely - chop the load screw off of the inovelli red dimmer. There’s still a super useful device there - it keeps track of a value, lets you toggle it on/off, shows you its state on the led, display notification effects on the LED. It wires directly into your wall so that you don’t have to change batteries, and you can reuse that hole in the wall that would otherwise be wasted. That is a great piece of hardware that integrates nicely into my room and lets me do cool home automation things with it. If you sold this device I’d probably buy it.

Now adding the ability to control an electrical load is a killer feature, because now I can use it in cases where there was already a ceiling light or whatever wired into that hole in the wall. But I don’t always need that feature and with smart bulbs its an anti-feature.

To give you a real life example, the first zwave switch I bought (which I’m planning to replace with an inovelli red) was a jasco toggle switch. I got it because I had an existing switch on my wall that controlled an outlet that made perfect sense as the living room light, but the outlet was not where I wanted to put lighting. So I put in the jasco and can control some bulbs across the room. When I flip the switch a loud relay clicks and it toggles power to the outlet - but I don’t want it to toggle power because I don’t want that outlet to be switched anymore (since I’m not using it for lighting). Its annoying. My other options were to get a battery powered wall controller and stick it on my wall… but then I’d still have this toggle switch that does nothing.

[Eric_Inovelli]

Are you just basically asking for a remote but that’s hard-wired in the wall that can dim up/down and turn on/off other smart devices (in addition to being a hardwired light switch)?

If I’m not getting it, I’ll likely have someone else jump in as I just don’t get it .

@joshfee

To give you a real life example, the first zwave switch I bought (which I’m planning to replace with an inovelli red) was a jasco toggle switch. I got it because I had an existing switch on my wall that controlled an outlet that made perfect sense as the living room light, but the outlet was not where I wanted to put lighting. So I put in the jasco and can control some bulbs across the room. When I flip the switch a loud relay clicks and it toggles power to the outlet - but I don’t want it to toggle power because I don’t want that outlet to be switched anymore (since I’m not using it for lighting). Its annoying. My other options were to get a battery powered wall controller and stick it on my wall… but then I’d still have this toggle switch that does nothing.

I have this exact setup in two of my daughter’s rooms so this is where I’m struggling to understand how our switch doesn’t do what you’re asking (aside from the LED bar tracking and reporting the switchmultilevelreport).

My example:

• Red Series On/Off switch is wired to a switchable outlet
• I don’t want this outlet to be switchable as it has an Amazon Alexa plugged in
• I’ve disabled local and remote control on the switch so that now no one can turn off the outlet (so power can’t be cut to the outlet)
• There are two bulbs in the room that are Philips Hue bulbs (not connected to the outlet)
• Using the LZW30-SN, I’ve setup tap sequences to turn on/off the lights and change their colors

Granted, I didn’t put a dimmer on the outlet bc of code, but if I did, I could do the same thing (ie: make the switch a remote).

Then by adding in the switchmultilevelreport feature, we’d be able to have better control over the dimmable Hue bulbs while reflecting the proper status on the LED bar.

Sorry if I’m just not getting it – I’ll likely have @EricM_Inovelli or @jtronicus chime in as maybe they can explain better. I still need to read @jtronicus’s explanation in the other thread.

[joshfee]

Yep, you’ve pretty much got it

@Eric_Inovelli

aside from the LED bar tracking and reporting the switchmultilevelreport

This is kind of a big thing for an “aside from”. I want every switch in my house to behave the same, regardless if its wirelessly controlling a smart bulb or an electrical load (I don’t want to have to explain to my fiance or guests “Well this room doesn’t show you the brightness level on the LED, and instead of pressing and holding you have to double tap. But this other room is actually dimming the load so you press and hold… etc”. I’m looking for unification.

I can have what I want right now if I hardwire load to line - this is what I’m doing in my bedroom. But I’m going to be annoyed when I want or need to change (e.g. sell the house - light switches should work like people expect without a hub) and instead of changing a setting I have to pull the switch out and rewire.

[Eric_Inovelli]

@joshfee

This is kind of a big thing for an “aside from”. I want every switch in my house to behave the same, regardless if its wirelessly controlling a smart bulb or an electrical load (I don’t want to have to explain to my fiance or guests “Well this room doesn’t show you the brightness level on the LED, and instead of pressing and holding you have to double tap. But this other room is actually dimming the load so you press and hold… etc”. I’m looking for unification.

Yeah I completely understand and meant no offense by insinuating this was not a big deal. I was merely trying to isolate the issue to understand what we currently have vs where the gap is. So apologies if it came off as otherwise.

One of the big things we’re focusing on in 2021 is user experience. Super important to us and me personally. Completely understand the pain-point in having to explain to the significant other and/or guests how the house works. Not fun at all.

I think I’m clear now in understanding what needs to be done. Thanks for hanging in there with me. Now time to try to explain this to the firmware engineer!

@jtronicus – is what @joshfee talking about and/or asking for align with how you envisioned SBM to work in your post here: Smart Bulb Mode Optimization Thread - #3 by jtronicus?

[fullhack]

Hello all,

I attempted to update two of my dimmers to 1.52 tonight.

The first one went off without issue, upgraded ok, maintained functionality have tested a bunch and it is working as expected.

Went I went to update the second switch, it completed the upgrade and things looked ok. I went to disable the relay and enable smart bulb mode and it is now stuck in a loop (red/green/blue flashing in a continuous loop with my smart bulbs flickering on and off for a second or two). I tried air gapping and attempting to factory reset, but nothing has worked. Any thoughts on how I can force a factory reset easily so I can get a stable switch to edit settings or reflash?

I actually pulled it out and threw a dumb switch in place for now as it is currently unusable.

All suggestions appreciated

Thanks!

P.S. This is a non-neutral setup and I did enable option 52 (I came from a very old FW, 1.35). I’m thinking it has to do with option 52 and the non-neutral setup as that should be the only thing that was changed as far as settings are concerned. The first switch that updated without issue is a neutral setup and I also enabled the smart bulb option, but it looks to be working just fine.

[mamber]

@Eric_Inovelli

@Bry 's solve below is how you would accomplish what you’re trying to do. Good news is we haven’t changed that feature since the beginning

@Bry

Try this: Set parameter 1 to “0” and set default z-wave and local levels to “99”. Reportedly, this will mimic the Smart Bulb Mode in 1.47.

No, that does NOT accomplish the same thing. That is how I had it set in V1.45 BEFORE Smart Bulb Mode was added in v1.47. It was close but not the same because setting the dimming rate to 0 does not DISABLE dimming, it just dims very fast. The killer is that Parameter 5 is restricted to 1-45 so the Minimum Level can not be set any higher than 45. Setting the dim rates and ramp rates to zero still allows the load to “dim” down to 45 instead of being fixed at 100%. V1.47 provided what I needed when it introduced Smart Bulb Mode which keeps the load at 100% with any SetLevel other than 0. V1.52 changes it so the load is ALWAYS 100% with any SetLevel INCLUDING 0 which breaks things for me because I want the load to be off when SetLevel is 0 and the load to be 100% with and SetLevel other than 0 (this is the v1.47 smart bulb behaviour).

@EricM_Inovelli

I can post it up on the server, but the recommendations about changing a couple parameters may work for you so try that out first.

@EricM_Inovelli PLEASE make v1.51 available as the parameter changes do NOT mimic the same behaviour as I have explained above.

@joshfee

I reallllly encourage you to stop thinking disabling local/remote control is a solution here, as it is not. I DO want to be able to update the logical state of the switch (turn it on, off, set its dim level) both locally and remotely - I just don’t want it to change the load.

It is really useful to have a smart device on the wall that I can use to communicate with the hub. Scenes are not a replacement, as scenes don’t allow you to press and hold to gradually dim the value from 0 - 100%. Also even for on/off, to use scenes to accomplish this in home assistant I would have to create a virtual switch and have automations that turn it on and off when it sees

the scene events… this is so unnecessarily complicated when I already have a switch device that does all of the things I want… I just don’t want it to affect the power sent to my smart bulb.

YES YES THIS ^^^^^^^ ALL THIS ^^^^^^^
Although, I still like being able to turn the load ON/OFF (100% or 0%)

@Eric_Inovelli

So, while we may be able to solve this via firmware, the hardware in a dimmer is much different and the reason why we can’t endorse putting it on outlets or other non-dimmable devices.

Understood and I certainly wouldn’t be using it for outlets, motors, appliances, etc. But there are many lights that are not dimmable, including most CFL’s and many types of modern LED bulbs. I have non-dimmable LED bulbs and CFLs in locations today that may get replaced with dimmable LEDs in the future. I may be wrong but I don’t believe running these lights with dimmers fixed at 100% can be much of a risk. And forcing us to swap out switches whenever the bulb type changes seems a bit excessive if the firmware would simply support a non-dimmable mode.

@joshfee

Key point is remotely setting the level to 50% should update the LED [Status Bar] to 50% but keep the power output at 100%.

Yes, exactly!

@Eric_Inovelli

Ok, but I guess what is the point of the LED bar moving and not reflecting the status of the load? I’m not pushing back, I promise – I’m just trying to really understand the use-case here. I see count-down timer suggested, but outside of that, I’m not sure what the use-case would be.

If the only use for the LED Bar was to reflect status of the load then it might as well just be a single LED just like on the on/off switches. The multi-segment bar is what makes the Inovelli distinctive and stand out from other brands. EMBRACE IT Start thinking outside the box For starters, with Smart Bulbs, the load output from the switch should always be 100% but the LED Status Bar should reflect the Level of brightness (SetLevel) of the bulbs. There are MANY other possibilities. A countdown timer is one good example where the level of the bar is indicating time left rather than light intensity. This happens now with V1.47 and a Fade command is sent with Smart Bulb Mode enabled. Another example could be indicating relative number of bulbs lit when there is more than one bulb being controlled (versus the intensity of all bulbs). I have some ceiling can lights that have a “LED Halo” ring. Its activated by switching the fixture on/off/on. I can use the LED bar to indicate (0%=lights off, 50%=Halo on, 100%=main light on). Or how about using it to indicate the relative value of a luminance sensor that controls outdoor lights. Also possible could be the relative position of the garage door (garage closed=0ff, garage moving=50%, garage open=100%). Another thought is using it to indicate a Battery level. Basically, ANYTHING with a relative value could be indicated. I realize some of these examples belong in the “LED notifications” category, but there is [currently] no way to set the LED Bar “level” via the LED notifications. However a SetLevel() command currently does set the LED bar level and could be used for various indications when the load is non-dimmable.

@mamber

One way to do this, which I think would be very simple - without needing to create a new parameter - is to allow the existing parameter #5 “Minimum Level” to be 99 (allow a range of 1-99 instead of the current restriction of 1-45). This would have a two-fold benefit:

1. Some dimmable LED’s need minimum of 50 or more to turn on. (They can often be dimmed lower, but they don’t turn on unless the minimum is over 50)
2. Allowing a value of 99 here would effectively disable all dimming but otherwise retain full control both local and remote.

I would really like to see an official response from Inovelli on this suggestion. I think it would be very easy to implement (possibly no more than text editing the restriction in the DTH) and it would effectively disable dimming as well as address issues with LEDs that need more than 50% to turn on. Is there some reason this is not being considered? I think I’m going to try a modified DTH just to see if that works. Its an easy edit to change the range from 1-45 to 1-99, but I don’t know if there is something hard-coded in the switch firmware that will override or prevent Minimum Level higher than 45. If the firmware is restricting it, then WHY? If this were implemented, it might also limit the range on the LED Status Bar (maybe or maybe not?). That might possibly limit some of the current LED Bar functionality and would not be ideal if it does. But I think its an easy way to provide a “non-dimming” setting without having to create a whole new parameter. Currently, setting the Minimum Level to 45 (the max) and sending a SetLeve(1) outputs 45% to the load but only lights up the lowest segment on the Led Status Bar, so it looks like the Led Bar still tracks SetLevel from 0-99 and hopefully will still do that if the Minimum Level were set to 99 and a SetLevel() was sent with something less than 99 (expecting load to stay at 100% but Led Bar track the SetLevel)

[Bry]

@mamber

No, that does NOT accomplish the same thing.

OK, that was @EricM_Inovelli’s thought. But that’s a good point about the max value on the lower threshold. Eric will have to comment.

[EricM_Inovelli]

@mamber It is a firmware limitation that was introduced to reduce the complications if a user were to set the minimum level higher than the maximum. For example, if you set the minimum to 99 and the maximum to 75. At the time we did not see a need to have a minimum that high, but do see it now. We can program around that scenario though. That’s why we have beta releases is to figure this stuff out.

[stu1811]

Has anyone tested the new parameter 50? I set the delay to 100ms and 900ms and I can’t perceive a difference. I already tried excluding and including after updating the firmware to 1.52.

[mamber]

@EricM_Inovelli

It is a firmware limitation that was introduced to reduce the complications if a user were to set the minimum level higher than the maximum. For example, if you set the minimum to 99 and the maximum to 75. At the time we did not see a need to have a minimum that high, but do see it now. We can program around that scenario though. That’s why we have beta releases is to figure this stuff out.

Is it coded into the actual firmware in the switch or just the Device Handler? Its pretty easy to program it so setting any Minimum forces the Maximum be the same or greater. Has that been done in any of the beta releases?

BTW, thanks for making 1.51 available on the download site

[jtronicus]

@mamber

Is it coded into the actual firmware in the switch or just the Device Handler?

Its coded in the firmware on the switch. There was a discussion about it a long time ago (I cant find the post), but I believe the main concern at the time was the lack of space on the device (firmware flash size). If you allow the minimum value to be set to anything up to 99, then you have to add additional checks/logic to ensure that the minimum value is not set higher than the maximum value.

The 500 series chipsets in these switches has very limited firmware space, and some features have already had to be removed to free up enough space for some of the enhancements added in the beta versions.

[EricM_Inovelli]

@mamber

BTW, thanks for making 1.51 available on the download site

No problem. I did a total organizational change for the dimmer on the firmware site. Hopefully that didn’t cause any confusion.

[jbilodea]

@Eric_Inovelli I’m testing 1.52. I just want to say THANK YOU for adding an adjustable delay between 100ms and 900ms. That’s amazing. Now the switch reacts really fast when i single click.

Thank you so much for listening to our requests !

[Eric_Inovelli]

Thanks man, that means a lot

[jbilodea]

That’s why I prefer to buy my stuff from Inovelli, they are listening ! Just to compare, ask for a change at GE…

[fullhack]

@fullhack

Hello all,

I attempted to update two of my dimmers to 1.52 tonight.

The first one went off without issue, upgraded ok, maintained functionality have tested a bunch and it is working as expected.

Went I went to update the second switch, it completed the upgrade and things looked ok. I went to disable the relay and enable smart bulb mode and it is now stuck in a loop (red/green/blue flashing in a continuous loop with my smart bulbs flickering on and off for a second or two). I tried air gapping and attempting to factory reset, but nothing has worked. Any thoughts on how I can force a factory reset easily so I can get a stable switch to edit settings or reflash?

I actually pulled it out and threw a dumb switch in place for now as it is currently unusable.

All suggestions appreciated

Thanks!

P.S. This is a non-neutral setup and I did enable option 52 (I came from a very old FW, 1.35). I’m thinking it has to do with option 52 and the non-neutral setup as that should be the only thing that was changed as far as settings are concerned. The first switch that updated without issue is a neutral setup and I also enabled the smart bulb option, but it looks to be working just fine.

Update:

I managed to get out of the loop by yanking the switch and powering it via an extension cord temporarily. Factory reset and managed to get it back.

As soon as I would disable the local relay and then attempt to enable smart bulb mode, it would get stuck in that boot loop and the only way I could seem to recover is to pull it out and hook it back up to external power (extension cord) to adjust the settings to default.

As an FYI, I am running 6 11W smart bulbs on that switch.

[mamber]

@jtronicus

If you allow the minimum value to be set to anything up to 99, then you have to add additional checks/logic to ensure that the minimum value is not set higher than the maximum value.

I understand space is limited, but lets be real. Its an extremely simple code segment:

• IF (Min>Max) THEN Max:=Min

Also, v1.49 removed the local config mode which I’m sure freed up a LOT more space than one line of code

V1.49 - 12/16/2020

Remove local configuration mode (to make space for extra features).

[Byarnell05]

@stu1811 I have it working on 5 switches. If you set it to 100ms you should have to tap the switch at near superhuman speed to get scenes to activate. Are you sure you don’t have the delay disabled altogether?