Alright guys, I am having a hard time keeping up with this thread, while at the same time inputting everyone’s information in our database, so apologies if I miss something again.
Yes, I am manually doing this and I will send out an email afterwards to let you guys know. It’s going to take some time, but I promise I will get to everyone.
I would like a picture of the QR Code and the IEEE number. Honestly, if you just give me a picture of the QR Code on that sticker in the box that shows the EUI number, that’s fine. I just need a way to verify the IEEE number you send over is correct so that we’re not getting claims later on for the same number.
Yes, you can certainly keep the defective ones – more than likely if you have a strong mesh, they will work just fine, but at the very least we just want you to have good switches
Yeah, I will run the list again and see what’s going on. @Courtney_Inovelli – can you help me re-run anyone that’s purchased the Blue Series switches?
@magicalbrad – yes, you can use the form in this thread, sorry for the confusion.
Ok, thank you for sharing – we have a 2.07 now, so I will see if we can get that to you. Let’s chat over in the other thread so I can keep these threads straight.
Yeah, it does put us in a predicament and while I can’t stop people from repairing/reselling these, I would hope that by receiving a replacement for free, it would discourage this behavior – more of an honor system type thing.
It is a good point that someone who is talented could bring life into an otherwise dead product and I think that if that person can, they need to be completely upfront about the fact that these are refurbished, but yes, it kind of stinks for us when the customer writes in and demands a new product – or even worse, something happens to their house because the switch was tampered with. Worst case scenario, I know, but it does keep me up at night.
To give you some perspective into my paranoia – we had $175k worth of switches stolen from us a couple years ago. There was absolutely nothing we could do to shut them down even when we caught them on Amazon, nothing – no one cared. Well, some of those switches were defective (just manufacturer defective) and the customer wrote into us to get it replaced. Now not only were we out the money that was stolen from us in inventory, but we felt like we had to replace the switch too bc the customer couldn’t return the switch (bc Amazon wouldn’t take it back). Just sucks, but yeah cost of business I suppose.
Truth is, the manufacturer does not want these back as they know they’re defective and it would cost too much to send these back to them and then send them back to us (likely almost the cost of the switch itself), let alone the cost to grab them back from you guys.
I think to mitigate waste, per @grooves12 point, we will offer to take yours back if you don’t want them or don’t want to dispose of them, and we will figure out how to properly dispose of them.
Yeah, I will be manually inputting these and sending out an email. We don’t have a sweet process that automatically does this for us. I suppose I couldn’t tried to set one up, but I was so caught up in getting this taken care of I didn’t think about it.
No, unfortunately, they do not want these back.
Either or is fine. We can cross-reference your name and we have both numbers in our system. Great question!
Yeah I just used the same email addresses that were pulled prior that I sent out for pre-orders. Looks like some were missing, ugh. I’m having Courtney re-pull everything and hopefully I can figure out why it’s not working. Sorry about the mixup.
I emailed them yesterday to let them know to pass on my email to all their customers, so hopefully they do it within the next day or so. I did get a confirmation from them that they would.
But to answer your question, the form in this thread is the same, correct – feel free to use that one
I’ll PM you.
This is why I was asking for IEEE numbers + QR Codes. I plan on scanning the QR Code to verify the numbers.
Yup, we can certainly do that. Completely agree.
Yes, around 50% of the first batch were defective.